table of contents
- Tumbleweed 2.55.0-2.3
- Leap-16.0
- Leap-15.6
| GIT-HOOK(1) | Git Manual | GIT-HOOK(1) |
NAME¶
git-hook - Run Git hooks
SYNOPSIS¶
git hook run [--allow-unknown-hook-name] [--ignore-missing] [--to-stdin=<path>] [(-j|--jobs) <n>]
<hook-name> [-- <hook-args>] git hook list [--allow-unknown-hook-name] [-z] [--show-scope] <hook-name>
DESCRIPTION¶
A command interface for running Git hooks (see githooks(5)), for use by other scripted Git commands.
This command parses the default configuration files for sets of configs like so:
[hook "linter"]
event = pre-commit
command = ~/bin/linter --cpp20
In this example, [hook "linter"] represents one script - ~/bin/linter --cpp20 - which can be shared by many repos, and even by many hook events, if appropriate.
To add an unrelated hook which runs on a different event, for example a spell-checker for your commit messages, you would write a configuration like so:
[hook "linter"]
event = pre-commit
command = ~/bin/linter --cpp20 [hook "spellcheck"]
event = commit-msg
command = ~/bin/spellchecker
With this config, when you run git commit, first ~/bin/linter --cpp20 will have a chance to check your files to be committed (during the pre-commit hook event), and then ~/bin/spellchecker will have a chance to check your commit message (during the commit-msg hook event).
Commands are run in the order Git encounters their associated hook.<friendly-name>.event configs during the configuration parse (see git-config(1)). Although multiple hook.linter.event configs can be added, only one hook.linter.command event is valid - Git uses "last-one-wins" to determine which command to run.
So if you wanted your linter to run when you commit as well as when you push, you would configure it like so:
[hook "linter"]
event = pre-commit
event = pre-push
command = ~/bin/linter --cpp20
With this config, ~/bin/linter --cpp20 would be run by Git before a commit is generated (during pre-commit) as well as before a push is performed (during pre-push).
And if you wanted to run your linter as well as a secret-leak detector during only the "pre-commit" hook event, you would configure it instead like so:
[hook "linter"]
event = pre-commit
command = ~/bin/linter --cpp20 [hook "no-leaks"]
event = pre-commit
command = ~/bin/leak-detector
With this config, before a commit is generated (during pre-commit), Git would first start ~/bin/linter --cpp20 and second start ~/bin/leak-detector. It would evaluate the output of each when deciding whether to proceed with the commit.
For a full list of hook events which you can set your hook.<friendly-name>.event to, and how hooks are invoked during those events, see githooks(5).
Git will ignore any hook.<friendly-name>.event that specifies an event it doesn’t recognize. This is intended so that tools which wrap Git can use the hook infrastructure to run their own hooks; see "WRAPPERS" for more guidance.
In general, when instructions suggest adding a script to .git/hooks/<hook-event>, you can specify it in the config instead by running:
git config set hook.<some-name>.command <path-to-script> git config set --append hook.<some-name>.event <hook-event>
This way you can share the script between multiple repos. That is, cp ~/my-script.sh ~/project/.git/hooks/pre-commit would become:
git config set hook.my-script.command ~/my-script.sh git config set --append hook.my-script.event pre-commit
SUBCOMMANDS¶
run
Any positional arguments to the hook should be passed after a mandatory -- (or --end-of-options, see gitcli(7)). See githooks(5) for arguments hooks might expect (if any).
list [-z] [--show-scope]
OPTIONS¶
--allow-unknown-hook-name
--to-stdin
--ignore-missing
-z
--show-scope
-j, --jobs
Specify how many hooks to run simultaneously. If this flag is not specified, the value of the hook.jobs config is used, see git-config(1). If neither is specified, defaults to 1 (serial execution).
When greater than 1, it overrides the per-hook hook.<friendly-name>.parallel setting, allowing all hooks for the event to run concurrently, even if they are not individually marked as parallel.
Some hooks always run sequentially regardless of this flag or the hook.jobs config, because Git knows they cannot safely run in parallel: applypatch-msg, pre-commit, prepare-commit-msg, commit-msg, post-commit, post-checkout, and push-to-checkout.
WRAPPERS¶
git hook run has been designed to make it easy for tools which wrap Git to configure and execute hooks using the Git hook infrastructure. It is possible to provide arguments and stdin via the command line, as well as specifying parallel or series execution if the user has provided multiple hooks.
Assuming your wrapper wants to support a hook named "mywrapper-start-tests", you can have your users specify their hooks like so:
[hook "setup-test-dashboard"]
event = mywrapper-start-tests
command = ~/mywrapper/setup-dashboard.py --tap
Then, in your mywrapper tool, you can invoke any users' configured hooks by running:
git hook run --allow-unknown-hook-name mywrapper-start-tests \
# providing something to stdin
--stdin some-tempfile-123 \
# execute multiple hooks in parallel
--jobs 3 \
# plus some arguments of your own...
-- \
--testname bar \
baz
Take care to name your wrapper’s hook events in a way which is unlikely to overlap with Git’s native hooks (see githooks(5)) - a hook event named mywrappertool-validate-commit is much less likely to be added to native Git than a hook event named validate-commit. If Git begins to use a hook event named the same thing as your wrapper hook, it may invoke your users' hooks in unintended and unsupported ways.
CONFIGURATION¶
hook.<friendly-name>.command
hook.<friendly-name>.event
The <friendly-name> must not be the same as a known hook event name (e.g. do not use hook.pre-commit.event). Using a known event name as a friendly-name is a fatal error because it creates an ambiguity with hook.<event>.enabled and hook.<event>.jobs. For unknown event names, a warning is issued when <friendly-name> matches the event value.
hook.<friendly-name>.enabled
hook.<friendly-name>.parallel
hook.<event>.enabled
Note on naming: <event> must be the event name (e.g. pre-commit), not a hook friendly-name. Since using a known event name as a friendly-name is disallowed (see hook.<friendly-name>.event above), there is no ambiguity between event-level and per-hook .enabled settings for known events. For unknown events, if a friendly-name matches the event name despite the warning, .enabled is treated as per-hook only.
hook.<event>.jobs
Note on naming: although this key resembles hook.<friendly-name>.* (a per-hook setting), <event> must be the event name, not a hook friendly name. The key component is stored literally and looked up by event name at runtime with no translation between the two namespaces. A key like hook.my-hook.jobs is stored under "my-hook" but the lookup at runtime uses the event name (e.g. "post-receive"), so hook.my-hook.jobs is silently ignored even when my-hook is registered for that event. Use hook.post-receive.jobs or any other valid event name when setting hook.<event>.jobs.
hook.jobs
applypatch-msg, prepare-commit-msg, commit-msg
pre-commit, post-checkout, push-to-checkout, post-commit
This setting has no effect unless all configured hooks for the event have hook.<friendly-name>.parallel set to true.
For pre-push hooks, which normally keep stdout and stderr separate, setting this to a value greater than 1 (or passing -j) will merge stdout into stderr to allow correct de-interleaving of parallel output.
SEE ALSO¶
GIT¶
Part of the git(1) suite
| 07/07/2026 | Git 2.55.0 |